Blade
Runner: Forget it Deckard, it’s Chinatown
As
the dystopian film genre goes, Blade
Runner is a film that has much to say about the human condition and 1980’s
society. Not only that, but a
post-modernist tone is given to the film remnant of noir films including John
Huston’s Maltese Falcon and Roman
Polanski’s Chinatown. These three combined attributes have gained Blade Runner not only critical acclaim
but cult status.
Blade Runner
asks the question who is more human, the replicants or actual humans? It seems as antagonist (I use this term very
cautiously) and replicant Roy Batty’s sacrifice at the end of the film, his
feelings as love Pris’ dies and his own mortality shown throughout the movie,
answers the question. Roy is
particularly juxtaposed by his creator Tyrell.
Tyrell, the corporate official, offers up emotional vacancy in contrast
to the emotional and regretful Roy.
These two characters were particularly interesting to me as Tyrell is
vengeful enough to kill his own creation in Roy, where Roy just wants to fight
against his own mortality and live a free life, which ironically seems freer
than any other character in the film.
The freedom is represented quite often in the film by the theme of
sight. Sight is demonstrated throughout
the film as Tyrell uses glasses, or technology to see the world. Pris who spray paints her eyes to give the
appearance of blindness, while Roy has clear sight. In a climax of the film, Roy breaks Tyrell’s
glasses and gouges his eyes out, rendering him useless and killing him. Fulfilling the wrath the creation has on the
creator for creating a mortal being. A
large part of the film engages humanity and what it means to be human, and the
protagonist Deckard provides ambiguity as to if he is indeed a replicant or not,
which engages the middle ground of Roy and Tyrell reinforcing the films theme
of “who knows?” As important the theme
and cultural message is to the film, another important idea was in play in the
depiction of dystopian Los Angeles in the year 2019.
1980’s culture whether it be because of Reagan economics
or the crack-cocaine era, a large gap in economic and social class was found in
the rest of the country, but particularly in Los Angeles. Through Blade
Runner Ridley Scott honestly and brutally depicts the current state of L.A.
and sees it through an even more urbanized and socially imbalanced society as the
city is separated in to a ghetto and a more lavish lifestyle up in
skyscrapers. As Norman Kline suggests in
his article Building Blade Runner, he
offers that the ghetto closely resembles old forties structures, while
skyscrapers are built right on top of the old buildings (Scott makes this
decision with a societal theme in mind but also with post-modern aspects at
play). He chooses Chinatown specifically
because of the American people’s fear of Asian imperialism and the fear and
possibility of not being the only super power in the world. Directionally, it is as if the upper class is
directly looking down at the lower classes and the old way of life. Also interestingly as Kline points out in his
article many city planners vocally fantasized about making Los Angeles similar
to the bladerunner city. Ironically this
dystopian city features acid rain, non-existent nature surroundings, classist
and economically separated culture and an environment where humans are no
longer human. It may seem as though as a
society we are moving away from the bladerunner city, but perhaps we actually
are not. Ridley Scott as a director made
various decisions in order to follow the post-modern movement of the time by
paying homage to past noir films and earlier cinema.
Throughout Blade Runner I noticed quite a few small
references from movies such as Chinatown,
Metropolis, 2001: A Space Odyssey while following the overall noir genre. While watching Blade Runner I noticed that
the Tyrell Company looked similar to the workhouse in Fritz Lang’s German expressionist
film Metropolis. Since I could recognize the similarities the
first time I watched Blade Runner I
was able to infer how I would later be introduced to the Tyrell Corporation. Chinatown
for me was quite obvious how the hard-boiled independent detective had to solve
a crime and hunt down an individual in order to find out information. I also found that the lower ghetto was indeed
patterned on Chinatown, while the skyscrapers were built on top also was fairly
symbolic. I was also taken back to John
Huston’s classic Maltese Falcon which by many is considered the essential noir
film. It includes a hard-boiled
detective trying to figure out a crime while a crime and femme-fatale stands in
the way of his case (Huston also had an important role in Chinatown that would
cause film buffs an immediate association).
So in the spirit of post-modern movement Scott chose to reconnect with
the film noir genre in order to give the genre new strength.
Blade Runner
deemed by many to be one of the most important American films ever made, not
only makes questions morality and the state of current human condition but also
as to future and dystopian possibilities.
As a post-modern film it along with its predecessor Chinatown nearly
single-handedly revived the genre to inspire other more contemporary films such
as The Dark Knight, Sin City and Memento many of which Norman Kline gives
as example. Where this film can certainly ask more questions than answer, it
asks the audience to question the emotional and immoral state in which we move
towards the future and what we as a society can do about it.
I didn't even think about all the references to sight in the movie while I was trying to unpack it. That adds another layer to the movie that I hadn't even thought about. Not only are there the visual references to sight such as the Roy gouging out Tyrell's eyes, but Sebastian has an entire speech about his work with eyes in Tyrell's company. At the end of the movie, Roy's dying speech is about the things he has seen. I think you are on the right track as far as sight being a representation of freedom in the film. If you think about it, one of the problems we are facing as a society is our comfort with corporations to the point in which we don't even question or look into the practices of huge corporations like Monsanto (basically the food industry monopoly) or the involvement of corporations in politics (although I must say this seems to be changing as people bring attention to it). I would say that these references to sight are a critique of our comfort with letting capitalism and corporations run unchecked, taking freedoms away where we aren't even aware its happening. I also love how after Roy's moving speech about what he has seen, Decker has a change of heart and starts to actually see the world around him a little more objectively rather than just going with the flow like zombies as the rest of humanity has seemed to become trapped in doing.
ReplyDeleteI think you have a great point. Blade Runner was combinations of many noir and sci-fi films. As a result, legendary monster movie was born by Ridley Scott. It totally has gave many influenced to other movies after Blade Runner. Even though Blade Runner couldn`t succeed when it released because of E.T., Blade Runner was the best sci-fi noir film in 1980s.
ReplyDeleteYou make an interesting observation regarding the roles of eyes and sight. The movie has a certain fascination with that territory. They’re critical to the plot (the dilation detection, the red-eyes, and the eyeball engineer) and there is a certain symbolic nature to them too (Roy removing the eyes of his creator).
ReplyDeleteAs you pointed out, humans in the film usually have their sight covered in some way, perhaps a commentary on human arrogance. Tyrell has glasses that are pierced, Sebastian has those goofy eye-bulging glasses that Roy puts on, the eyeball engineer is an eccentric man whose work revolves around artificial sight. If a human’s eyes are not concealed then the replicants seek to remove them. Obviously, this happens to Tyrell, but what about Deckard? Well, I don’t think it was in this cut, but in the director’s cut (the more violent version) the eyeball engineer has his sight removed and there is an extension to the fight between Leon and Deckard after Deckard shoots Zhora through the shops, including a scene where Leon very nearly pokes in his eyes before Rachel blows his brains out.
As for Pris’ playfulness with the make-up, under the assumption that we’re to extract some deeper meaning from this obscurity of her eyes, I see two interpretations. She can either be attempting to humanize herself with genuine curiosity or envy; or is being playfully ironic and her bitterness matches that of Roy’s.
Regardless, these aggressions toward human sight enhance the beauty of the replicants’ views, as with Roy’s soliloquy and the marvels he’s seen in space; and it emphasizes the veil over the eyes of humankind. The fact that Deckard escapes unscathed on a couple of eye-gouging occasions could cater to the party of Replicant-Deckard theorists. Or, Deckard being spared more powerfully demonstrates a human revelation, a blessing or a second chance now that the veil has been lifted from his censored beliefs.
Great catch in the film!
Yeah I do remember seeing the eye engineer being blinded and killed in another version but I can't remember which one. I somehow forgot to mention this in the blog that I think it was curiosity because throughout the movie she along with Roy were really trying to find their identity (represented in sight). Also I forgot to put in 2001 references I was catching as the movie referenced Hal 9000. Particularly I saw as Roy was in the elevator the red light and shot selection made me think of Hal.
DeleteThis is a really strong review, with elements of good analysis. Also, a really good discussion here. There's so much to talk about with this movie, and I'm really glad you're all talking about some of those things. I've always been puzzled by the emphasis on eyes too. My own reading is part focusing on the Oedipal issues--murderous progenitors and vengeful creations, with the whole strange absence/artificiality of mothers--Leon's sudden murderous rage at mention of her, Rachel's false memories.... One aspect of Pris's eyes is, that was a real 80s punk look, which she's exaggerating into a mask. Also, I think she's doing it with real spraypaint instead of a cosmetic, which has gotta hurt if you're not a replicant.
ReplyDeleteI like the mention of Chinatown and Maltese Falcon too, especially in conjunction with the city architecture. This is the point you could have done more with though. I'd have liked to see a bit more exploration, since you already have such a good handle on this, as to why these noir references were specifically postmodern in this context. You lay out some fantastic pieces here, but I want to see what happens when you put them all together!