Robert
Townsend’s Hollywood Shuffle takes
racism in Hollywood and dissects the exploitation of African-Americans through
the roles actors receive as well as how each role is a perpetuation of stereotyping
African-Americans. An interesting aspect
of the film is how Townsend takes a specific case, as the audience follows Bobby
Taylor a self-respecting, intelligent African-American man who is forced to
play dumbed down and offensive stereotypes of African-Americans in movies. Hollywood
Shuffle forces the audience to not only observe racist tendencies in
Hollywood and general culture, but the film also provides a bench-mark in
Hollywood equality.
Hollywood Shuffle allows the audience to
observe a case-study in Hollywood racism in the form of Bobby Taylor. As the audience becomes acquainted to an
everyman whose only dreams are to make it big and play important roles in
Hollywood, we also see the inflicted limitations he has: the only parts for
African-Americans in Hollywood films are pimps, gang members or
prostitutes. One of the most important
aspects of the film is to ground the absurdity of Hollywood perceived realism
of African Americans, with Bobby’s normality allows the audience to see the
racially charged and offensive stereotypes media provides American consumers
with. Bobby as a person seemed as normal
to anyone I had ever met, from the way he dressed, to his interactions with his
siblings, to his demeanor and his way of holding himself, it appears that
pretty much any viewer of Hollywood
Shuffle could relate to Bobby Taylor in one way or another. The idea that Bobby is indeed an everyman who
struggles against a bias system, allows any viewer from any background to
juxtapose stereotypes seen in media compared to the normal individual in the
story.
The
comedic episodic quality Hollywood
Shuffle maintains allows the audience to compare the absurd roles in films
such as the zombie pimps or the ridiculous jive talking street members to Bobby
as an off-screen personality. It is this
primary juxtaposition that allows the audience to not only laugh at the
absurdity of the unrealistic film roles but also provides the audience a base
of normality, in order to base conceptions and actualities of a contemporary
African-American man. Another
interesting aspect to Hollywood Shuffle
is the idea that the film is a comedy, which is a universal genre. The fact that this is a comedic film allows
for an audience to not only see the absurdity in Hollywood stereotypes
comedically but also provides a viewer a light-hearted window in to the heavy
handed subject of Hollywood racism and bias.
After
the context of Hollywood Shuffle, and
demonstrated in one particular sequence in the film where African American
actors are taught how to be black by a white Hollywood executive, African
American artists such as Kenan Ivory Wayans are taking the position of business
executive and creative artist to provide contemporary audiences with
entertainment. Shows such as In Living Color, created by Kenan Ivory
Wayans, provided America with not only the common denominator of laughter but
also provided a skewering commentary on racism in America.
Ironically,
compared to the conclusion of Hollywood
Shuffle where Bobby must sacrifice his dreams of making it big in Hollywood
in order to maintain his dignity and not help Hollywood scorch society’s perception
of African-Americans, Kenan Ivory Wayans (who co-wrote Hollywood Shuffle) in particular has launched the careers of many
influential actors in Hollywood today.
Primarily from his sketch show In
Living Color, Wayans has launched the careers of many actors such as Damon
Wayans (My Wife and Kids), Shawn and
Marlon Wayans (Scary Movie), Jim
Carrey (Ace Ventura) and Jamie Foxx (Ray).
Also ironically, Jamie Foxx reached the critical acclaim Bobby dreams of
by winning an Oscar and being a successful Hollywood actor. It comes to show that films such as Hollywood Shuffle have become a
contributing factor in providing America with a greater understanding across
cultural boundaries and providing greater opportunity to African American
artists in a Hollywood setting.
As Hollywood Shuffle uses comedy in order
to portray the disconnect between the Hollywood representation of African
Americans and the more realistic portrayal of African Americans as a society it
provides us with a greater understanding of one another and to disenfranchise
any potential racial stereotypes. In Harriet
Margolis’ article Stereotypes in
"Hollywood Shuffle" and "I'm Gonna Git You Sucka" she says
“For example, by foregrounding stereotypes qua stereotypes, Hollywood Shuffle leaves
those of us who watch the film in its entirety in no doubt as to how Townsend intends
us to read its images.” To laugh at disastrous absurdity and observe greater
reality.
I really appreciate hearing about Kenan Ivory Wayans Living in Color sketch show. Its really great reading about the real life influence of this movie and the use of comedy as activism against racial stereotypes. Your analysis of the use of comedy in the plot and the sketch inserts in the film are spot on. The use of comedy to combat racial stereotypes is a very powerful thing in itself but the way that Townsend employed it as well as postmodern aspects of the history of the stereotypes in past films and in American society in general really made for a strong use of comedy and post modernity to undermine stereotypes of blacks in the film industry.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very strong review/analysis. Nicely written, and to the point. Do keep in mind though, that The Wayans Phenomenon really didn't take off until the 90s, so its not as if Keenan was hypocritically launching careers while critiquing the racial constraints of Hollywood images. I don't think that's what you meant at all, given the larger context of your discussion, but as phrased it sounds a little that way. You might argue that Keenan was one of the major figures responsible for widening the field a bit. OTOH, it could be argued that, just like the Eddie Murphy Syndrome, the Wayans Brothers in turn became the Representative Black Stars, which proves Margolis's opening point about how problematic it is to have the category 'black artist' as some kind of representative or essential thing at all. The fact that I'm coming up with these counter-arguments though attests to the strength of this post--it's arguable in a good way. More incorporation and synthesis of the reading would have been even better.
ReplyDelete